The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sued a non-fungible token (NFT) project, marking the first time the authority has taken enforcement action against a company for selling unregistered NFTs.
The SEC filed the lawsuit against Impact Theory, a Los Angeles-based media company, on Tuesday. The SEC alleged that Impact Theory sold NFTs called Founder’s Keys that were unregistered securities.
The SEC’s order said that Impact Theory “encouraged potential investors to view the purchase of Founder’s Key as an investment into the business, stating that investors would profit from their purchases if Impact Theory was successful in its efforts.”
The SEC also said that Impact Theory raised around $30 million from hundreds of investors, including those in the U.S.
The case is significant to the crypto industry, which has been hit with a flurry of regulatory clampdowns in the U.S., as it offers a clue for how NFTs could be regulated in the future. Many other NFT projects have used language that’s similar to how Impact Theory marketed its digital assets, that is, touting their blockchain-based identifiers representing digital asset ownership as investment opportunities.
Impact Theory neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings but agreed to pay more than $6.1 million in penalties to settle the allegations. The order also established a “Fair Fund” to compensate impacted investors as well as required Impact Theory to destroy all of its Founder’s Key NFTs and eliminate any royalties that it might collect from secondary market transactions.
The company is not giving up on its NFT endeavor. In a blog post, the founder of Impact Theory stressed that his company will ensure its future digital assets will be of utility rather than financial purposes:
“We will operate our go-forward business consistent with our good faith best understanding of all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, will make clear that all of Impact Theory’s digital assets are collectibles with utility within the exciting new landscape of Borderless Entertainment, and will fiercely discourage people from treating our digital assets as anything other than what they are—collectibles with utility. We will have more news on this in the coming weeks and months.”
The SEC’s lawsuit is a major development in the regulation of NFTs. It remains to be seen how the SEC will apply its findings to other NFT projects, but the case is a clear warning to NFT issuers that they need to be careful about how they market their products.
What does this mean for the future of NFTs?
The SEC’s lawsuit is a major development in the regulation of NFTs. It remains to be seen how the SEC will apply its findings to other NFT projects, but the case is a clear warning to NFT issuers that they need to be careful about how they market their products.
The case could also have a chilling effect on the NFT market. Some investors may be hesitant to invest in NFTs if they are concerned about the regulatory risks. However, it is also possible that the case will lead to more clarity and certainty in the NFT market, which could ultimately benefit investors.
Only time will tell what the long-term impact of the SEC’s lawsuit will be. However, it is clear that this is a significant development that all NFT issuers should be aware of.
Source: Techcrunch
